Quiz #102 Unpacking the Tanzin v. Tanvir Supreme Court Decision

The Religion Law Quiz Podcast

27-05-2024 • 4 minutos

In what year did the Supreme Court issue its decision in Tanzin v. Tanvir and what was the issue that the Supreme Court decided in that case?

(Scroll down for the answer)

Answer: The Supreme Court issued its opinion in 2020.  Here’s how the Supreme Court described the issue it was facing:

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA) prohibits the Federal Government from imposing substantial burdens on religious exercise, absent a compelling interest pursued through the least restrictive means. 107 Stat. 1488, 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb et seq. It also gives a person whose religious exercise has been unlawfully burdened the right to seek “appropriate relief.” The question here is whether “appropriate relief ” includes claims for money damages against Government officials in their individual capacities.

Tanzin v. Tanvir, 141 S. Ct. 486, 489, 208 L. Ed. 2d 295 (2020).

Disclaimer: The Religion Law Quizzes are provided as a service to you. They are intended only for educational purposes. Nothing in the Quizzes is intended to be legal advice and they should not be relied upon as conclusive on any issue discussed therein.

HERE IS AN AI GENERATED SUMMARY OF TODAY’S PODCAST

Welcome to the Religion Law Podcast, your go-to platform for comprehending religious freedom and hot topics related to religious law. In this episode, our host Michael Fielding delves into a significant yet underreported Supreme Court decision, Tanzan v. Tanvir. This decision was executed in 2020, a period where global attention was predominantly focused on the COVID-19 pandemic.

The crux of the Tanzan v. Tanvir issue pertains to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993, which prohibits the federal government from encumbering religious exercise without a compelling urge exercised via the least restrictive means. It also entitles an individual whose religious exercise has been unlawfully compromised to seek apt relief. However, the moot point brought forth by Tanzan v. Tanvir is the scope of "appropriate relief" under RFRA, examining the permit of individuals to sue government officials for financial damages in their personal capacity.

Join us as we unfold the implications of the Tanzan v. Tanvir decision and understand its potential consequences on religious freedom. Remember, our Religion Law quizzes are designed purely for educational enlightenment and should not be considered legal advice. If this episode has enlightened you in any way, please share it and don't forget to leave a review. Let's endorse the habit of being an advocate for good. We'll see you again for Quiz number 103. Stay enlightened. Music.

Te podría gustar

10 minutos con Jesús
10 minutos con Jesús
10 Minutos con Jesús
Voces del Misterio
Voces del Misterio
Jose Manuel Garcia Bautista
Iker Jiménez Confidencial
Iker Jiménez Confidencial
retirandomeporaqui
Dante Gebel
Dante Gebel
Grupo Argott
Dante Gebel Live
Dante Gebel Live
Dante Gebel
La Santa Misa
La Santa Misa
Guadalupe Radio
El Santo Rosario
El Santo Rosario
Guadalupe Radio
L'ofici de viure
L'ofici de viure
Catalunya Ràdio
Música de Relajación para DORMIR
Música de Relajación para DORMIR
Relajación y meditación
Noticias de Hoy
Noticias de Hoy
Noticias Hispanas
Dormir en 5 minutos. Relajación
Dormir en 5 minutos. Relajación
Relajación y meditación
Código Misterio
Código Misterio
Código Misterio
L'ofici de viure
L'ofici de viure
Catalunya Ràdio
Medita con Pilar
Medita con Pilar
Medita con Pilar
L'ofici de viure
L'ofici de viure
Catalunya Ràdio