Quiz #88 -- Refusal to grant exemptions -- Is that proper?

The Religion Law Quiz Podcast

08-05-2024 • 2 minutos

Religion Law Quiz #88

In Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 141 S. Ct. 1868, 1878 (2021) the regulations adopted by Philadelphia “incorporates a system of individual exemptions, made available in this case at the ‘sole discretion’ of the Commissioner. The City has made clear that the Commissioner ‘has no intention of granting an exception’ to” Catholic Social Services.  Id. (citations omitted).  Was the City of Philadelphia in the right to take this position?

(Scroll down for the answer)

Answer:  No.  As the Supreme Court said, “the City ‘may not refuse to extend that [exemption] system to cases of ‘religious hardship’ without compelling reason.”  Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 141 S. Ct. 1868, 1878 (2021) (citation omitted).

Disclaimer: The Religion Law Quizzes are provided as a service to you. They are intended only for educational purposes. Nothing in the Quizzes is intended to be legal advice and they should not be relied upon as conclusive on any issue discussed therein.

HERE IS AN AI GENERATED SUMMARY OF TODAY’S PODCAST

Welcome to another insightful episode of Religion Law Podcast. In this episode, our host, Michael Fielding, dissects the Fulton v. City of Philadelphia Supreme Court decision from 2021. A significant case concerning religious freedom and law regulations adopted by the City of Philadelphia, that stirred much contemplation and discussion.

In this judgment, the City of Philadelphia established a system of individual exemptions, made available at the sole discretion of the Commissioner. Interestingly, the Commissioner expressly stated that no exemption would be granted to Catholic social services. This led to the big question - was the city of Philadelphia right in taking this stance?

Many held their views, but here's what the Supreme Court thought - the city was not in the right. The Supreme Court emphasised that if a law significantly burdens the exercise of religion, the government must have a compelling reason for it. The ruling that discretionary determination by a commissioner does not constitute a compelling reason was a key takeaway from the Fulton v. City of Philadelphia decision.

Tune into this riveting episode as we continue dissecting this on Religion Law Quiz number 89. The Religion Law Quizzes intention purely lies in educating listeners about religious freedom and other religion law-related topics in a fun, question-and-answer-style format.

We hope this episode leaves you with some food for thought around religion laws and their complexities. Don't forget to share it with others and leave a review if you find it helpful. Until next time, keep learning and keep influencing for the better.

Te podría gustar

10 minutos con Jesús
10 minutos con Jesús
10 Minutos con Jesús
Voces del Misterio
Voces del Misterio
Jose Manuel Garcia Bautista
Iker Jiménez Confidencial
Iker Jiménez Confidencial
retirandomeporaqui
Dante Gebel
Dante Gebel
Grupo Argott
Dante Gebel Live
Dante Gebel Live
Dante Gebel
La Santa Misa
La Santa Misa
Guadalupe Radio
El Santo Rosario
El Santo Rosario
Guadalupe Radio
L'ofici de viure
L'ofici de viure
Catalunya Ràdio
Música de Relajación para DORMIR
Música de Relajación para DORMIR
Relajación y meditación
Noticias de Hoy
Noticias de Hoy
Noticias Hispanas
Dormir en 5 minutos. Relajación
Dormir en 5 minutos. Relajación
Relajación y meditación
Código Misterio
Código Misterio
Código Misterio
L'ofici de viure
L'ofici de viure
Catalunya Ràdio
Medita con Pilar
Medita con Pilar
Medita con Pilar
L'ofici de viure
L'ofici de viure
Catalunya Ràdio